* *

Picture Bit

            

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 01, 2024, 02:19:51 am

Login with username, password and session length

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 32006
  • Total Topics: 3964
  • Online Today: 21
  • Online Ever: 235
  • (December 09, 2019, 06:27:14 pm)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 40
Total: 40
40 Guests, 0 Users

Author Topic: Look Fournales v Crosslinks  (Read 9815 times)

Mr752

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Karma: 5
Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« on: January 18, 2008, 09:09:27 am »
Has anybody out there ridden Look Fournales forks?
I know Colin said he had a pair, but with the similarity between them and the Girvin/Noleen Crosslinks wondered how they rode.
Recall someone saying this is how the Crosslink may have evolved if production hadnt ceased.
Found a pair new and boxed for UK£157, fancied them for the next project when the XP-8 is finished.
AV=(Fxt)/M
XP-8
856
752

Lysander

  • Journeyman
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Karma: 4
  • Yeah! Just shov'm in the microwave for 30 secs....
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2008, 09:54:10 am »
If ye find a pair the right stack size, then snap them up- I been lookin' for ages- most of the ones left seem to be small, less than 137mm stack.
If ye can get a pair for £157, get two- I'll give ye £170 for a set!!! ;)

Mr752

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Karma: 5
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2008, 10:12:49 am »
regarding the stack height cant you put spacers in like you would on the crosslink, it doesnt state what size they are on the website, I'll mail them and find out.
AV=(Fxt)/M
XP-8
856
752

kiwi

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1871
  • Karma: 24
  • 756,wtb sstk,risse terminator, 97-carbon xlink,v's
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2008, 11:51:44 pm »
they may have a stack height SMALLER you can actually fit on your bike so be careful...
kiwi proflex rider

Colin

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
  • Karma: 14
  • in a village near Northampton, UK
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2008, 10:18:30 am »
£157.50? What? This one?

It's a Small.

Yep, a small will only fit a headtube up to 137mm, which rules out all of our bikes doesn't it?

But note also, that the Small fork is fundamentally a different fork to the Medium and Large.

I enquired with Look/Fournales about modding a small to fit a 155mm Headtube but they say the parts are not interchgangeable. Now that I also have a Large Fournales I can see the difference, on the Large the bottom stanchion is flat, on the Small it is a different piece that protrudes probably to allow the same shock to fit. The top pivot arm is different as well. I think some other parts are different as well.

See photos:
Small           


Med/Large   


Also, interestingly, the steerer tube is in two pieces on the Fournales, upper and lower.

Of course the main attraction is the standard Disk mount on them. This is so tiny (see top photo) that I cannot imagine any concerns with modding a Crosslink in a similar fashion, I have seen Callum's postings re: his discussions with PRO~FLEX in the day, so maybe only OK for a Carbon Crosslink not Ally?

I haven't fitted mine to try them out so can't comment on the ride.

One day..................

Col.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2008, 10:47:32 am by Colin »
2001 OzM
2000 OzX
1999 x500
1999 900 Frame
1998 4000se
1998 4000
1997 957 Frame
1997 857 Frames
1997 XP-X (856)
1995/6 x55/x56 Frame
1992 962 Frame
1991 Marin Pine Mountain with a Flex Stem

signalMTB

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • Karma: 1
  • rebuilt K2 4000
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2008, 11:15:41 am »
very sexy fork.  my only wish is Crosslinks would have adopted the straight dropout as in the Look
'98 K2 4000 FOR SALE!!

kiwi

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1871
  • Karma: 24
  • 756,wtb sstk,risse terminator, 97-carbon xlink,v's
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2008, 05:02:06 pm »
i think the x55 and x56 bikes have a very short headtube,even the way bigs...
kiwi proflex rider

Colin

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1244
  • Karma: 14
  • in a village near Northampton, UK
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2008, 06:45:46 am »
i think the x55 and x56 bikes have a very short headtube,even the way bigs...

Don't you think that I considered that? <GRIN>

Measured at 145mm  on my Medium XP-X (856) with OEM Headset.

Oooh! Just thought, "I wonder if my old rigid Marin Pine Mountain has a shorter headtube"..................I was considering putting a pair of crosslinks on it................

Col.
2001 OzM
2000 OzX
1999 x500
1999 900 Frame
1998 4000se
1998 4000
1997 957 Frame
1997 857 Frames
1997 XP-X (856)
1995/6 x55/x56 Frame
1992 962 Frame
1991 Marin Pine Mountain with a Flex Stem

kiwi

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1871
  • Karma: 24
  • 756,wtb sstk,risse terminator, 97-carbon xlink,v's
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2008, 02:14:45 pm »
i think the x55 and x56 bikes have a very short headtube,even the way bigs...

Don't you think that I considered that? <GRIN>

Measured at 145mm  on my Medium XP-X (856) with OEM Headset.

Oooh! Just thought, "I wonder if my old rigid Marin Pine Mountain has a shorter headtube"..................I was considering putting a pair of crosslinks on it................

Col.

i looked very carefully at the list of your bikes before i made that post...if i had any real conviction about it i would have measured the headtube on my own bike :P
kiwi proflex rider

Mr752

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 65
  • Karma: 5
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2008, 04:41:49 pm »
They are the ones Colin!
Emailed the guy at Gedibikes, (called Ged would you believe) that was couple of days ago and no reply! You can obviously tell by that lower link that they are the small size.
What range does the large and medium sizes cover? I ride medium(18-19") could get away with a large at a push so it would be good to know if a set comes up for sale.
By the way,the guy on US Ebay selling the Crosslinks with smart shocks, exactly what planet is he on!!!!!!!!??????????
AV=(Fxt)/M
XP-8
856
752

Lysander

  • Journeyman
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
  • Karma: 4
  • Yeah! Just shov'm in the microwave for 30 secs....
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2008, 10:20:40 am »
I contacted gedbikes a while ago- sadly they've none left.................. :(

xp8-er

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: 0
  • what doesn't kill you... usually just hurts a lot
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2008, 11:42:48 am »
Hi there,  I have ridden the fournales fork as they are on my bike at the momement  and they are very good. Firstly the travel claimed is what you get and secondly it is cadillac smooth. On small stuff they are amazing and they gobble up the larger stuff without drama. The small bump sensitivity is poss due to a negative spring and a small elastomer mount which compresses slightly.

Brake dive is an issue if you do not get the air pressure correct but this is true for any fork. Seperate rebud/  compression damping would have been nice but hey ho. The weight is amazing and chaps at the local bike shop were impressed at how good an eleven year old bike can be!! : ;D :D.

shovelon

  • Global Moderator
  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2229
  • Karma: 16
  • Down there? DOWN THERE!???
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2008, 05:13:55 pm »
Very nice xp-8er. A mean looking machine.

With your Fournales and Risse, how much does your xp-8 weigh? (Opps, found it in the other post, 23.9 lbs)

So what upgrades are next?

Terry
« Last Edit: February 15, 2008, 05:19:13 pm by shovelon »
OzM,(Ozzie)
K24000,(Red)
957small,(Shorty)
957Large,(Monty)
956 LE,(Peirce)    <Sold>
Offroad "Proflex" (Serrota),
Serotta CST  titanium softail
McMahon FS

xp8-er

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: 0
  • what doesn't kill you... usually just hurts a lot
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #13 on: February 17, 2008, 01:39:43 pm »
The full current spec is  xt chainset,  xtr 8 speed casette, xt front deraileur ( the original one!! 8))  mavic crossmax st wheelset ceramic coating,  continenal supersonic tubes,  continental twister supersonic tyres, rithey wcs stem, ritchey wcs carbon bars and seatpost ,  titec foam grips ,  fizik gobi saddle with ti rails,  carbon bottle cages ti screws of course, xtr rear mech with kcnc jockey wheels, xtr v brakes, ritchey pro v4 pedals , original xt shifters /brake levers ,  risse astro 5 rear shock ,  look/fouranales carbon fork ( and spare set of mavic crossmax xl wheels with skinny continental  ultra gator skins for road work hence the ass up face down position. I have stupidly long legs  :o maybe frog genetics at work.... ;).  Just remembered the hope headset. It sounds expensive but i say  God Bless ebay and all who ride because of her... ;

I dont have any plans for any more mods as the bike is solid but i admit the thought of a set of hope mini pro disc brakes is tempting..... ;D

I probably won't convert to discs though as the expense of conversion doesn't justify it,  but if another xp8 frame came my way then......... ::)

shovelon

  • Global Moderator
  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2229
  • Karma: 16
  • Down there? DOWN THERE!???
Re: Look Fournales v Crosslinks
« Reply #14 on: February 17, 2008, 03:47:55 pm »
OMG, the more I look at your bike, the faster is seems. Man it just looks wicked fast. I really like how the black swingarm compliments the black fork. Soooo, the 8 means 2008 model? LOL;D ;D ;D

No way, don't do the disks, V brakes are way lighter. If you work the weights a bit, you could speed up sprints alot. I would think you could get it close to 20 lbs. Current race bikes only wish they could get that light.

Gosh you gotta love Proflexes.
Terry
OzM,(Ozzie)
K24000,(Red)
957small,(Shorty)
957Large,(Monty)
956 LE,(Peirce)    <Sold>
Offroad "Proflex" (Serrota),
Serotta CST  titanium softail
McMahon FS