Welcome to the new and improved Proflex / K2 Tech Forum!
i am gonna say large....frame does not look "dwarfed" by the wheels,though without tyres maybe not quite as normally perceived.Hmmm not so sure now..Maybe ask the question?
Quote from: kiwi on March 19, 2008, 12:15:53 ami am gonna say large....frame does not look "dwarfed" by the wheels,though without tyres maybe not quite as normally perceived.Hmmm not so sure now..Maybe ask the question?OK so it’s a Medium ; and the seller would be prepared to ship over the pond. I can’t find ANY size indication on my 5500…It’s 53cm center to top of seat clamp can anyone tell me what size it is please.Could be useful to have a spare kicking around, and the wheels look fun.Couldn’t help laughing at how he says it’s super light… he repeated that in his reply to me…L
Luke, as I recall, the Medium and Large(only sizes available in carbon) were the same length in top tube, with the only difference of 1 inch shorter from bb center to top of seat mast. Simon had both, and Jeffhop has the medium right now so they could chime in. My Oz measures 52.5cm to top of alum seatmast insert, and 19 inches at the carbon seatmast/toptube junction, which would tell me that it is a large. And I know that mine is a large.Terry
Quote from: shovelon on March 20, 2008, 08:21:07 amLuke, as I recall, the Medium and Large(only sizes available in carbon) were the same length in top tube, with the only difference of 1 inch shorter from bb center to top of seat mast. Simon had both, and Jeffhop has the medium right now so they could chime in. My Oz measures 52.5cm to top of alum seatmast insert, and 19 inches at the carbon seatmast/toptube junction, which would tell me that it is a large. And I know that mine is a large.Terrydi you lose your original tape meaure terry..?one measure ment inches the other cm???
Can't belive the only offer I have had is the KHS You would think with how rare these are it would shift, I couldn't belive my luck when I got it how times have changed.
Luke, as I recall, the Medium and Large(only sizes available in carbon) were the same length in top tube, with the only difference of 1 inch shorter from bb center to top of seat mast. Simon had both, and Jeffhop has the medium right now so they could chime in. Terry
Quote from: shovelon on March 20, 2008, 08:21:07 amLuke, as I recall, the Medium and Large(only sizes available in carbon) were the same length in top tube, with the only difference of 1 inch shorter from bb center to top of seat mast. Simon had both, and Jeffhop has the medium right now so they could chime in. TerryBeg to differ, but the top tube length is just short of 1" (actually 25mm) longer on a Large and the leg length is the same. Note that this is very difficult to measure because it is a virtual measurement from the of the top of the headtube to a horizontal point in the centre of the seat tube {effectively the middle of the seat post}The only differences between a Med & Large (according to K2) are:Top Tube ("A" in diagram)MD 22.13" 562mm LG 23.11" 587mm Wheelbase ("D" in diagram)(increase is all forwards of the BB)MD 42.01" 1067mm LG 42.99" 1092mmBottom Bracket to Seat mast top is the same. ("K" in diagram)MD 19.61" 498mm LG 19.61" 498mm I have both and the difference is so minimal as to be Unnoticeable (to me).Col.
I just can't get on with full sus bikes, I have tried for years to do it but just can't, prob from too many years of being a roadie.