* *

Picture Bit

            

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 22, 2024, 03:40:28 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 32006
  • Total Topics: 3964
  • Online Today: 161
  • Online Ever: 235
  • (December 09, 2019, 06:27:14 pm)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 171
Total: 171
171 Guests, 0 Users

Author Topic: Non-proflex bike opinion...  (Read 10958 times)

fyrstormer

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
  • Karma: 3
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2014, 05:17:20 pm »
You could probably sell that Crosslink Carbon w/ Smart Shock for more than enough to buy a modern sliding fork, with money left over to pay for the adaptor you'll need for that Manitou Swinger shock.

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2014, 05:28:20 am »
You could probably sell that Crosslink Carbon w/ Smart Shock for more than enough to buy a modern sliding fork, with money left over to pay for the adaptor you'll need for that Manitou Swinger shock.


Problem is I love crosslinks.
The small bump sensivity, the looks... they are built for this frame. So it is difficult for me to part it out from the frame.

As for the swinger, it needs a rebuild (I have it for many years now) and I will only put it due to the difficulty of the noleen rebuilds.

I think it will look something like this, with a two tone in the front (shopped picture after a red 857), but the brown colors will match the carbon waving colors):



As for modern bikes, I'm negotiating a complete Yeti ASR 5 bicycle with top components. Problem is that it has a bunch of miles on top (around 3000 miles), but with maintenance done.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2014, 05:31:25 am by whisperdancer »
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

Spokes

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 981
  • Karma: 11
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #17 on: February 06, 2014, 12:56:50 pm »
I like that colour scheme! Quite unusual and a perfect contrast to the yellow decals. If you like your Crosslinks then keep them. As you're buying a second bike it will be nice to have a modern bike and a traditional Proflex to appreciate the contrast. Can't wait to see your finished results.

Chris
4000
857
856's
OZx modern build
757
4500
957
955
5000
no room in big shed but always room for one more!

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2014, 07:08:14 am »
Not the Proflex 957 yet, but the more modern bike:



It really is different from an almost 15 year ride! At least they both have a CF swingarm...
11.9Kg (26.2lbs) of 150mm front and 125mm rear travel.

The "brown" Proflex is still in the works...
« Last Edit: March 26, 2014, 01:58:50 pm by whisperdancer »
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

Tel

  • Journeyman
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
  • Karma: 4
  • My cycling buddys
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #19 on: March 28, 2014, 01:26:45 pm »
Sorry to admit it but I mostly ride a 29" Cube these days but I still love my Proflex XPX the one big thing that I don't miss one bit is the brakes I`ve tried the XTR v brake route and HS33 maguras both with ceramic mavic crossmax slrs and by comparison they just give me something to fiddle with just before crashes. If only there was some proper way to get them on the front of a cross link I wouldn't consider another bike.
Never whistle through your teeth with a mouthfull of blancmange

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2014, 10:06:25 am »
I do feel the crosslink makes a great climber of the bike, but even when doing a u turn in a paved road at very low speed, the front wheel feels as it is going to start moving backwards at any time.
The confidence is very different between bikes. But I do love the Proflex for it's (now) awkward looks and reliable service over these years.
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2014, 09:03:01 am »
I like that colour scheme! Quite unusual and a perfect contrast to the yellow decals. If you like your Crosslinks then keep them. As you're buying a second bike it will be nice to have a modern bike and a traditional Proflex to appreciate the contrast. Can't wait to see your finished results.

Chris


A long time has past since I've posted a question about which color should I paint a k2 1000 frame I had in red.
Having decided for the brownish color with yellow decal theme, i'm preparing the frame for receiving the CF swingarm and crosslink carbon fork, and all the parts from the Animal frame.

So, went from this:




to this:
















I don't know if too much yellow/gold is a bad think, but the KCNC gold upgrade set seems nice...
« Last Edit: September 30, 2014, 09:04:55 am by whisperdancer »
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

beeeerock

  • Apprentice
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • Karma: 0
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2014, 09:51:03 am »
This colour scheme looks really good!
Nothing is foolproof for a sufficiently talented fool.

Spokes

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 981
  • Karma: 11
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2014, 03:06:07 pm »
I applaud you sir, that looks fantastic.

Chris
4000
857
856's
OZx modern build
757
4500
957
955
5000
no room in big shed but always room for one more!

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2014, 08:10:02 am »
I believe the links aren't working.
Here is a bigger photo.

Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

purple gerbil

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 271
  • Karma: 4
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2014, 11:06:46 am »
Nice job! Will look great when it's finished.
THE 1 AND ONLY PURPLE GERBIL...

1991 ALPINESTARS AL-MEGA DX.
1992 PRO-FLEX 862.
1994 PRO-FLEX 954.
1994? GT RTS.
1998 GT LTS DS 2000.
1998 K2 4000se PROJECT.

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Non-proflex bike opinion...
« Reply #26 on: December 02, 2014, 01:52:12 pm »
In a veeeery slow build, "gooing" everything up:














Meanwhile I had to get new bushings for the rear strut, as I've broke one trying to get them off the old aluminum swingarm. Here is a picture of them for future reference:




Strut is on, and next thing is to put the shock adapter and the EPICON, as well as the BB, the aheadset and the crosslink fork (I'll be using the spare crosslink smart fork I still have).
« Last Edit: December 03, 2014, 02:34:56 am by whisperdancer »
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5