* *

Picture Bit

            

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 25, 2024, 05:44:11 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 32006
  • Total Topics: 3964
  • Online Today: 58
  • Online Ever: 235
  • (December 09, 2019, 06:27:14 pm)
Users Online
Users: 0
Guests: 46
Total: 46
46 Guests, 0 Users

Author Topic: Carbon with strut  (Read 4212 times)

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Carbon with strut
« on: February 26, 2011, 09:38:55 pm »
I was very bored so I started playing with photo editor.  I have seen a few pics of the evos with struts and that got me wondering, what would a carbon frame look like with a strut, so I made one.  My photochop skills aren't the greatest but you get the idea.  I have to say, I really like it and i may have to look a little further into it. What does everyone think? Also, Does anyone know if the strut used on the evo was the same as an 857 or a custom piece?

P.S. Thanks to the bike owners for the use of your pictures.

orange

  • Administrator
  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 1496
  • Karma: 24
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2011, 12:36:45 pm »
bit 'fat' at the front and 'skinny' at the back, but nice try :D
'95 855
'91 Diamond Back Topanga (project: 1st MTB)
'06 Surly Karate Monkey 29er
Custom built Edelbikes 29er #1104

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2011, 01:08:51 pm »
I've always thought that the evo swing arm was too bulky looking.  The smaller fork legs always looked out of place since everything else was so fat.  I'll post a real photo sometime if I get around to actually trying it. 

Old Proflexer

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
  • Karma: 9
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2011, 06:36:47 pm »
i like it -
Yeah, they don't make 'em anymore - it's a classic - - -

whisperdancer

  • Master
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Karma: 2
  • Unusual 957...
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2011, 02:58:50 am »
I like it too!!! Never thought it could turn out so good looking.
However, I wish I could get rid of the strut in my WC frame so I could use a standard shock on it...  ;D ;D ;D
Proflex '97 Animal with Carbon Swingarm & Crosslink Carbon fork
K2 1000 frame, Carbon Swingarm,Crosslink Carbon CS being worked to be a 957
Yeti ASR 5

shovelon

  • Global Moderator
  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 2229
  • Karma: 16
  • Down there? DOWN THERE!???
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2011, 07:56:22 pm »
Dang it!!!

I can't see any of the image. For some reason TimeWarner restricts some data.

stangman675 I am going to PM you.

Terry
OzM,(Ozzie)
K24000,(Red)
957small,(Shorty)
957Large,(Monty)
956 LE,(Peirce)    <Sold>
Offroad "Proflex" (Serrota),
Serotta CST  titanium softail
McMahon FS

fyrstormer

  • Guru
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
  • Karma: 3
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2011, 08:41:49 pm »
You do know the strut is the single biggest downside to Pro-Flex frames, right? It adds weight, it requires an extra pivot that has to be maintained, it puts shear loads on the shock bushings that causes the shock to wear out faster, and it renders the frame incompatible with most shocks on the market.

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2011, 08:53:56 pm »
You do know the strut is the single biggest downside to Pro-Flex frames, right? It adds weight, it requires an extra pivot that has to be maintained, it puts shear loads on the shock bushings that causes the shock to wear out faster, and it renders the frame incompatible with most shocks on the market.

Of course there are downsides to it.  I have to wonder though, why were the evo frames that were used for racing fitted with the old style suspension and why the 957 is still such a sought after bike.  Something else that crossed my mind was the issue that the carbons have with the shock plate rivets breaking/loosening up.  I believe there would be less stress on the plates with the strut setup so that might be something to think about.  The limited shock selection is definitely an issue, especially if you're like me and can't afford a Risse. 

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2011, 04:55:23 pm »
I tried the swap today.  I measured the travel with both swingarms and was surprised at the results.  With the stock swingarm and NR-4,  there was 82mm/3.22" of vertical travel.  With the 957 setup, the travel was 76mm/2.99".  I'm not sure how they figure the advertised 4" of travel.  There were no major issues.  I used all the pivot parts for the carbon frame as the 957 parts are a bit different. The ride height is also about 1cm lower in the rear with the 957 setup but I don't think that would cause any problems. There were a couple little issues. First is that the the head of the shock hits the skeleton of the frame before it can go deep enough into the mount to line up properly with the bolt hole.  A tiny bit of filing in the area would fix the problem.  The other issue is that the front derailleur is very close to the swing arm.  It didn't seem to hit but it think it could while riding.   I have attached a few pictures and I have to say, it doesn't look as good as I thought it would.   

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2011, 04:56:22 pm »
+

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #10 on: March 10, 2011, 04:57:14 pm »
+

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2011, 04:58:01 pm »
+

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #12 on: March 10, 2011, 04:59:00 pm »
The helpful donor. 

stangman675

  • Novice
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Karma: 0
Re: Carbon with strut
« Reply #13 on: March 10, 2011, 05:20:55 pm »
I also found out in the process that my "large" 4500 is actually a medium.  Luckily there isn't much difference.