Welcome to the new and improved Proflex / K2 Tech Forum!
I don't feel the swingarm on my 5500 is flexy either. Or maybe its the right amount of flexy for me. Who knows.Rich
In my experience it is difficult to separate tire and wheel lateral movement from swingarm movement.
I wonder what a 4-bar would do with such a test.
An Oz with carbon arm will be be more flexy (laterally)thanan Evo with a carbon arm,there's alot of flex in that arm but the carbon mainframe pivot mount flexes considerably morethan the Evo,I would of liked to of tried an Evo with analuminium s/arm ,sealed bearings and a propedalshock preferably one with large eyelet bearingsand large shaft bearings with alot of overlap,think that would make a fast informative ride,think the Evo frame gets unfairly overlooked becausethe carbon looks so cool IMHO,in hindsight I would of liked to of owned one to play around with.Simon.
My Evo with alum swingarm and factory sealed bearings is very rigid. It is a spare to my Oz, but has lots of potential.Terry
Terry bet there's not much weight differencebetween the 2 either talking main frame and s/arm assemblies.Oh before anyone buys an Evo aluminium s/arm fora carbon bike, don't won't fit too narrow to clearmainframe,unless you cut it about but thats quiteinvolved.Simon.
Now here is the ticket. Put the Evo alum swingarm on the Oz, 957 swingarm and strut on the Evo, and the Oz swingarm on the 957. [smiley=bomb.gif] [smiley=bomb.gif] [smiley=bomb.gif] [smiley=bomb.gif] [smiley=bomb.gif] [smiley=nod.gif]Terry