K2 / Proflex Riders Group

General => Tech Forum => Topic started by: Matno on September 07, 2003, 02:35:34 pm

Title: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: Matno on September 07, 2003, 02:35:34 pm
Just went on my first "real" MTB ride in a while (too long), and took along a friend with a brand new Trek Liquid 10. Not top of the line, but decently spec'd with RockShox Psylo C fork (125mm travel) and Fox Talas R rear air shock (up to 5" of rear wheel travel). I was surprised initially that it was heavier than my bike, which I estimate to weigh about 29lbs (was 27 before the switch to disc brakes and wheels). Once on the trail, we switched rides for a while, and I was really surprised at the difference in feel. While the Liquid felt more "solid" to me (I think that translates to lateral rigidity), the EVO, with Helix Pro rear and X-vert fork, was absolutely smoother. Both of us agreed that the EVO was a much better ride, and I even had a hard time getting him to switch back after 20 minutes or so!

This is limited, anecdotal evidence, I know, but suffice it to say that the Liquid was a bike that I've been coveting since it came out. Not any more... 8)
Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: Old Proflexer on September 07, 2003, 03:27:15 pm
right on point with what i've been saying for quite some time -

newer technology is not necessarily an improvement, just different.  hard to improve on the monopivot design with the latest in shock techology - even with an nr- they still hard to beat - including the weight factor.

- hey, did you ever heal up to be fully functional?

OP
Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: Carbon_Angus on September 07, 2003, 04:00:50 pm
i rode one quite a-ways back and found it very rigid but couldn't really "find" the travel. It had a Fox 125 Vanilla on it and that was sweet, though.

i think if it was dialed in for me i'd like it, but then i still ride my Pro~Flex/k2's with Noleen...so go figure

Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: jimbo on September 07, 2003, 05:25:15 pm
Mountain Bike Magazine dittos your review:

http://www.mountainbike.com/bikes/0403_trekliquid30.shtml
Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: Matno on September 08, 2003, 12:11:31 am
Quote
hey, did you ever heal up to be fully functional?

OP


If you're referring to my hand, then yes, I'm fully functonal and pain free. Modern medicine is amazing. Unfortunately, I didnt' even get much of a scar... ;)
Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: Old Proflexer on September 08, 2003, 01:46:24 am
Price: $3,080 (30); $1,870 (Liquid 10); $2,200 (Liquid 20);
$1,650 (frame only)
Weight: 31 lbs.


thought this was worth noting for those who are looking to buy new as opposed to upgrading their evo -


OP

(yes, just curious about your wrist, was wondering if you ever made it back to 100%)

Title: Re: K2 EVO vs Trek Liquid
Post by: pedro on September 08, 2003, 04:30:58 am
My riding buddy uses a trek 20. I agree 100% with the above opinions: the trek feels more solid, but is less compliant, does not absorb bumps as much, feels like it has much less travel. May be due to the air shock.